that date to offices of
the subordinate service.
2.
In connexion
with this question,
you forward copies of former
minutes
of Public Works and the
Attorney General on the application of Mr. L. Gibbs dealt with in despatch No. 340 of the
24th October, 1900.
3.
I have to
inform you that after consideration of the arguments put forward
in the enclosure to your
desp., I am of opinion
that the decision
embodied
in
desp. above
referred to should be
reversed. Mr. Gibbs may
accordingly be paid the proportion of the
increment of $600
which he claims for the period from 1 January to
31 March 1900.
4.
This
decision will also apply to the general question
raised in
paragraphs 1 and 2 of your despatch.
I am,
that date to offices of
the subordinate service.
2.
In conexion
with this question,,
you forward [copies of formy
als
minutes
The Duits
of Puble Works and the
Fult Altorney General on the application of elles. L. Gibbs dealt with in dish No. 340 of the
24th Octoly, 1900.
3
my
I have to
inform you that aft Consideration of the arguments put forward
in the enclosure
logour
desp, I am of opinion
that the decision
embodied
ні
3 desf. above
refined to should be
reversed. Mh. Gibbs may
for my conson
J
C.
76
accordingly be paid the proportion of the
increment of $600
which he claims for the period from 1 Janney 631
March 1900.
4.
This
- decision will also affly to the general question
paragrapples
raised in
1 and 2 of your desk.
I hans.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.